A
reproduction of this original photo / photo-postcard size 10" x
7" approx available. Order photograph here © Walker
Archive. Order Code PGB118
Photograph
taken after the German Fleet was scuttled on 21st June 1919.
Identified
as the Von Der Tann by Stuart Haller: Only Von Der Tann has the broken deck edge near
the bow which are indicative of gun sponsons. Also note the
relatively short hull. (2nd Email from Stuart). It is true that Von
der tann sank beneath the waves, but what is not considered here is that
many of the ships were photographed as they were sinking. The jagged edge
near the bow are the gun sponsons of Von der Tann, which are not on
Seydlitz. The Hull is also to short for Seydlitz
Identified as Seydlitz. Email message
: I understand why people think this is Von Der Tann. but the broken deck edge referred to by
Stuart Haller doesn't
come from a "gun sponson," it comes from a raised forecastle
deck, which both Seydlitz and Von Der Tann had. The simple fact,
however, is that seydlitz was the only capital ship to turn on her side,
and one of only three to remain visible after scuttling. the only
other capital ships to remain visible above the surface of Scapa were Hindenburg,
Baden (as she was beached) and just a bit of Moltke at low
tide. Von Der Tann turned upside down and sank completely, unlike
seydlitz. To solve this conclusively, see "jutland to
junkyard," by s.c. George, which contains a description of how Von Der
Tann was raised. it's a fascinating book.
Previously identified
as the Von Der Tann by Stuart Haller: Only Von Der Tann has the broken deck edge near
the bow which are indicative of gun sponsons. Also note the
relatively short hull. (2nd Email from Stuart). It is true that Von
der tann sank beneath the waves, but what is not considered here is that
many of the ships were photographed as they were sinking. The jagged edge
near the bow are the gun sponsons of Von der Tann, which are not on
Seydlitz. The Hull is also to short for Seydlitz
There
is obviously a difference of opinion on this photograph. Many people
have emailed us identifying this ship arguing that it is either Von der
Tann or Seydlitz, however, based on the above email, we have now placed it
on the Seydlitz page.