World Naval Ships Forums  
VIEW ALL OF OUR CURRENT SPECIAL OFFERS HERE!

Go Back   World Naval Ships Forums > Naval History > Member Articles
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Member Articles Naval articles submitted by our community members.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #526  
Old 19-09-2017, 16:31
FlankDestroyer FlankDestroyer is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 89
Default Re: Warship Collisions, Groundings, Fatal Events

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Denlay View Post
To get an idea (that is if there are any other land lubbers here) just how close the fore-guns can 'point aft of abaft' , the below plan of the arcs of the fore-guns on the cruiser HMS Exeter (68) give some idea of what it may have been like on the bridge / inside the superstructure when fired at that angle! Red and green dots show max aft angle of #2 and #1 turret respectfully.

And fired at that angle they were, as that is exactly, repeat exactly, how they were found pointing on the wreck of Exeter when discovered in 2007 in the Java Sea (long before she disappeared into the hands of illegal salvagers that is, but that’s another story.)

And if you go to this page here, post 26, you will see HMS Tiger with her even bigger guns pointing in a similar direction. Ouch.
http://www.worldnavalships.com/forum...2#post10169342
x
x
Ouch is right and that is painful. Yes that is exciting on the bridge!

Guns pointed abaft the beam makes for decidedly unpleasant conditions on the bridge. Much more so than in the mounts themselves! Additionally when the guns/mounts/turrets are trained that far aft besides the blast etc. there are still more factors to consider for the bridge team. For instance will the train limit stops or firing cut out systems actually work and will you destroy your own bridge? And if the safety systems function properly will you therefore stop engaging the enemy as your guns stop firing? Should the bridge team maneuver and clear/open the firing arcs and hazard formation integrity and or risk collision. And of course none of this is done is isolation as the enemy is likely maneuvering for their own tactical advantage to open or close the range to suit their battery.

So going back to Grosser Kreuzer's question re whether flash was a contributory factor to the collisions that occurred. Yes smoke. flash, shock and debris all impact a bridge team's performance and this is even before you potentially take fire. Whether in training or combat, warship watch officers have a lot to consider besides point to point seamanship.

Last edited by FlankDestroyer : 19-09-2017 at 16:46.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Ship Search by Name : Advanced Search
Random Timeline Entry : 9th January 1958 : HMS Eastbourne : Commissioned

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is a Warship? Bart150 Other Naval Topics 19 28-07-2014 19:34
USN Ship Collisions Old Salt US Navy Ships and Crews 3 11-12-2012 06:43
HMS Cleopatra 11/2/1942 Fatal Day stephen street Service Records / Naval Relatives and Friends 5 01-04-2011 17:50
The Naval Events During The Norwegian Campaign 1940 - Recommended hucks216 Naval Book Forum 1 28-08-2010 16:27
16 October events from RN day by day tim lewin Other Naval Topics 3 17-10-2009 01:19


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.