World Naval Ships Forums  
CURRENT SPECIAL OFFERS ON OUR HUGE SELECTION OF ART PRINTS!

Go Back   World Naval Ships Forums > Naval History > US Navy Ships and Crews
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

US Navy Ships and Crews Topics relating to a specific American ship or ships.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 29-02-2012, 16:23
The Skipper The Skipper is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

The last 2 posts have summed it up very nicely. The military is indeed for the defense of the United States, and the huge budget deficit is due, at least in part, to the politicians mis-using it to interfere in other countries (probably to secure cheap oil). HOWEVER none of this justifies cutting it. The only way to deter foreign aggression is to maintain a substantially larger and better- equipped military than everyone else. The British made this mistake in 1982, when the Thatcher government made major cuts to the military, in order to cut the budget deficit. This prompted the Argentinians to invade the Falkland Islands, with the loss of 256 British lives. Unfortunately, many politicians seem to think that the military can be cut in peacetime, when, in fact, it is a strong military which guarantees peace. Remember Ronald Reagan's motto: 'Peace through strength'.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-03-2012, 05:27
BlackBat242's Avatar
BlackBat242 BlackBat242 is offline
Rear-Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Considering that the USN is larger (in ships above 1,500 tons) than the next-largest 3 (or 4) navies combined, I think there is room for some re-adjustment of numbers, don't you?

Even the British Empire only maintained a superiority over the next 2 largest navies... and then only for a couple of decades!
__________________
Only a fool fights in a burning house. __ Jon A., Sgt USMC '81-'89; CV-61 USS Ranger '85-'87
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-03-2012, 14:35
The Skipper The Skipper is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

So America cuts its Navy down, while China builds hers up. Not very clever. We will all regret it, if China, with its communist regime, overtakes America as the World's dominant military nation.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:51
BlackBat242's Avatar
BlackBat242 BlackBat242 is offline
Rear-Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

That would take a long time, and both a lot of cutting by the US and a lot of building by China.

Yes, China has to be the US' biggest long-term concern (in terms of national military strength), but the situation does not require panic or over-reaction.
__________________
Only a fool fights in a burning house. __ Jon A., Sgt USMC '81-'89; CV-61 USS Ranger '85-'87
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-03-2012, 16:26
Don Boyer's Avatar
Don Boyer Don Boyer is offline
Forum Moderator.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Haleiwa, Hawaii (North Shore of Oahu)
Posts: 3,676
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

It's a repititive cycle in about every country of the modern world.

Got those nasty wolves with bared dripping fangs at the door that could take your relatively benign and peaceful lifestyle or your life away?? Clamor for military action! Save us, oh mighty warriors, from probably what was our folly to begin with!! Three cheers for our valiant men and women of the military -- lets throw a parade!

And, should yon peaceful citizens be blessed with their valiant warrior's victory on the fields of glory?? Oh -- we don't need YOU anymore. You are too expensive to maintain now that everything is hunky dory -- you take money away from important things like the greedy and avaricious pursuit of profits and privilege at all costs. We're cutting your weapons and pay and benefits because you're a drag on the economy and there's no war on anyway.

Funny, are those wolves I see on the horizon? And are they headed this way??
__________________
Don Boyer, GMT-2,
USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31)

"With 2000 years of examples behind us we have no excuse, when fighting, for not fighting well." T.E. Lawrence

Last edited by Don Boyer : 03-03-2012 at 17:42.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-03-2012, 16:42
WGVSr WGVSr is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 726
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Boyer View Post
It's a repititive cycle in about every country of the modern world.

Got those nasty wolves with bared dripping fangs at the door that could take your relatively benign and peaceful lifestyle or your life away?? Clamor for military action! Save us, oh mighty warriors, from probably what was our folly to begin with!! Three cheers for our valiant men and women of the military -- lets throw a parade!
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-03-2012, 17:52
designeraccd's Avatar
designeraccd designeraccd is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Guess I missed out on the parade when I returned to CONUS from Viet Nam. As for the rest (posts #30 and #31): oh so true! One "good" thing about humans...we never learn.

The next time tho, the West will not have the luxury of time and infrastructure to rapidly build a massive war machine, but let's not worry about that minor detail those progressive social programs need "feeding".......DFO
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 13-03-2012, 23:54
Surfgun Surfgun is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 618
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

The cruiser Vicksburg has deployed for her final cruise.


By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Nick C. Scott, Enterprise Carrier Strike Group Public Affairs

USS VICKSBURG, At Sea (NNS) -- Guided-missile cruiser USS Vicksburg (CG 69) departed its homeport of Mayport, Fla., March 9 to make its final deployment, this time as part of the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group.

Family members, friends and well-wishers gathered on the pier in the early morning hours to bid farewell to loved ones and wish them good luck.

"This is the first time I've deployed," said Cryptologic Technician (Technical) 3rd Class Ronnie Mathis temporarily assigned to Vicksburg from the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71).

"It was difficult to leave my six-week old daughter and wife behind, but the crew is really nice and is helping me get through it," said Mathis.

Deploying can be challenging for a lot of Sailors, even seasoned veterans who still must make sure all affairs ashore are in order.

"It doesn't really get any easier," said Navy Counselor 1st Class Brian S. Olinger, the career counselor aboard Vicksburg. "I've been in the Navy for 19 years and this is my fifth and final sea deployment. No one wants to leave their loved ones behind, but we have a mission."

This deployment marks the end of Vicksburg's 20 years of service since its commissioning in 1992.

"The mission must come first, the mission is why we are here in the first place," said Ensign Michael E. Fitzpatrick, first lieutenant for Vicksburg. "The crew understands that and they are very professional."

Although this is the last deployment for Vicksburg, mission readiness is still the key to success.

"We must not view this deployment in terms of being the last deployment," said Capt. Logan Jones, commanding officer of Vicksburg. "We are not looking for any final glory."

Jones also said that "at the end of the day we know that we will have served with honor, but we must not react differently than we normally would in any given situation."

Vicksburg's commanding officer is just one of the ship's crew looking forward to completing a successful deployment as part of the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group team.

"I look forward to a deployment of working with maritime partners, flying missions and providing security," said Jones. "My job is to leave with 370 Sailors and return with 370 Sailors and that is what I intend to do."

Vicksburg is scheduled to decommission in 2013.

The Enterprise Carrier Strike Group is comprised of Enterprise, Carrier Air Wing 1, Destroyer Squadron 2, Vicksburg (CG 69), and guided-missile destroyers USS Porter (DDG 78), USS Nitze (DDG 94), and USS James E. Williams (DDG 95).
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 14-03-2012, 20:31
Surfgun Surfgun is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 618
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

An update with the vessels to be decommissioned in fiscal year 2013.

11 ships to be decommissioned in fiscal 2013
By Jacqueline Klimas - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Mar 14, 2012 16:53:59 EDT
Six frigates, four cruisers and an aircraft carrier are set to be decommissioned during fiscal 2013, according to a Navy message released Monday.

NAVADMIN 087/12, released by Deputy Chief of Naval Operations Vice Adm. John Blake, includes deactivation dates and the fates of the ships. The six frigates will be sold to foreign militaries, while the four cruisers will be dismantled.

Enterprise, the world’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and the oldest active-duty warship in the fleet, will move to a shipyard March 15, 2013. There, it will await a date for decommissioning.

Enterprise left on its final deployment Sunday.

FISCAL 2013 DECOMMISSIONING SCHEDULE
Oct. 31: frigate Crommelin.

Feb. 15: frigate Underwood.

Feb. 27: frigate Curts.

March 15: carrier Enterprise and frigate Carr.

March 22: frigate Klakring.

March 31: cruisers Cowpens, Anzio, Vicksburg and Port Royal.

Aug. 30: frigate Reuben James.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 15-03-2012, 01:20
WGVSr WGVSr is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 726
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surfgun View Post
An update with the vessels to be decommissioned in fiscal year 2013.


Aug. 30: frigate Reuben James.
Yet another proud name to be gone.
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 15-03-2012, 09:20
designeraccd's Avatar
designeraccd designeraccd is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Further clarification from USN:



2. THE PROJECTED FY13 SHIP INACTIVATION SCHEDULE FOR INACTIVATING U.S. NAVAL VESSELS IS PROMULGATED AS FOLLOWS TO FACILITATE FLEET PLANNING EFFORTS TO CONDUCT A DECOMMISSIONING CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE AVAILABILITY (CMAV) OR INACTIVATION AVAILABILITY (INAC):

SHIP NAME INACTIVATION POST DECOM STATUS
USS CROMMELIN (FFG 37) 31 OCT 2012 SEE NOTE 1
USS UNDERWOOD (FFG 36) 15 FEB 2013 SEE NOTE 1
USS CURTS (FFG 38) 27 FEB 2013 SEE NOTE 1
USS CARR (FFG 52) 15 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 1
USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 65) 15 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 2
USS KLAKRING (FFG 42) 22 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 1
USS REUBEN JAMES (FFG 57) 30 AUG 2013 SEE NOTE 1
USS COWPENS (CG 63) 31 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 3
USS ANZIO (CG 68) 31 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 3
USS VICKSBURG (CG 69) 31 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 3
USS PORT ROYAL (CG 73) 31 MAR 2013 SEE NOTE 3

NOTE 1: VESSEL IS DESIGNATED FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALE (FMS). PER REF A, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF NON-TRANSFERRABLE TECHNOLOGY IDENTIFIED BY NAVSEA AND NAVY IPO UNDER SEPCOR, NO ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT REMOVALS ARE AUTHORIZED ON THE FRIGATES EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY OPNAV N8F IN RESPONSE TO A RECORD MESSAGE REQUEST THAT INCLUDES JUSTIFICATION FOR REMOVAL AND INCLUDES COORDINATION VIA THE APPROPRIATE SYSTEMS COMMAND. TYCOMS ARE REQUIRED TO ENSURE STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS DIRECTION. PER REFS A AND B, IT IS NAVY POLICY THAT SHIPS DESIGNATED FOR FMS TRANSFER SHALL NOT BE STRIPPED. STRIPPING OF SHIPS PROVIDES DIMINISHED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY TO MARITIME PARTNERS AND CORRODES OUR EFFORTS TO BUILD MARITIME PARTNER CAPACITY. SEE PARAGRAPH 3 FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT REMOVAL GUIDANCE.

NOTE 2: DATE INACTIVATION BEGINS IN A NAVAL SHIPYARD AND THE UNIT IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR OPERATIONAL TASKING. FINAL DECOMMISSIONING DATE SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE CNO AND NVR CUSTODIAN IAW REFS B AND C.

NOTE 3: VESSEL WILL BE DECOMMISSIONED AND DISPOSED OF BY DISMANTLEMENT. REQUEST USFFC AND CPF COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILIZING VESSELS IN A LOGISTIC SUPPORT STATUS PRIOR TO THEIR DISMANTLEMENT WITH OPNAV N8F VIA N86.

3. AN OPNAV WORKING GROUP WILL BE REVIEWING THE LOGISTICAL NEEDS OF THE NAVY AND THE CAPABILITY NEEDS OF OUR MARITIME PARTNERS. FLEET REPS, PROGRAM OFFICES, AND FMS STAKEHOLDERS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO JUSTIFY THEIR REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT REMOVALS AND EXPLORE OPPORTUNITIES TO MITIGATE IMPACT TO FLEET AND INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS AS PART OF THAT REVIEW. DETAILS OF THE WORKING GROUP FORUM WILL BE PROVIDED VIA SEPCOR.


Looks like the "cruisers" will be rapidly put to the cutting torch.......DFO
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 15-03-2012, 09:29
designeraccd's Avatar
designeraccd designeraccd is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

More on the "cruisers":

"•USS Cowpens (CG 63) will be 24 years old at retirement. She is currently homeported in Yokosuka, Japan and should still have at least 11 good years in her. The ship was in a Selected Restricted Availability (SRA) maintenance period last month, and fields the AN/SPY-1B radar capable of being upgraded to the latest AEGIS ballistic missile defense baselines with the Cruiser modernization program.
•USS Anzio (CG 68) will be around 22.4 years old at retirement. She is currently homeported in Norfolk, Virginia and should still have at least 13 good years in her. Also fielding the AN/SPY-1B radar, the ship was expected to be upgraded to a ballistic missile defense cruiser with the cruiser modernization program.
•USS Vicksburg (CG 69) will be around 21.6 years old at retirement. She is currently homeported in Mayport, Florida and should still have at least 14 good years in her. USS Vicksburg (CG 69) departed with the USS Enterprise Strike Group this week on what is scheduled to be her last deployment. Also fielding the AN/SPY-1B radar, the ship was expected to be upgraded to a ballistic missile defense cruiser with the cruiser modernization program.

•USS Port Royal (CG 73) will be around 20.3 years old at retirement. She is currently homeported in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and should still have at least 15 good years in her. USS Port Royal (CG 73) ran aground in February 2009 and a great deal of money was spent repairing the ship over 7 months from the damage of that incident, and an additional $14 million was spent at the end of 2010 repairing cracks found in the ships hull. It is unclear if the ship is still suffering from serious problems related to that grounding incident, or simply a product of poor maintenance by the Navy. USS Port Royal (CG 73) is one of a handful of existing US Navy AEGIS Cruisers with Ballistic Missile Defense capability.
In my opinion, unless there are serious undisclosed material condition problems on (Port Royal?) these ships, this is a Bullshit Popsicle. The over 500 VLS cell missile capacity of these 4 warships exceed the combined missile capacity of the Royal Navy, the French Navy, the Italian Navy, the Spanish Navy, the Dutch Navy, the German Navy, the Turkish Navy, or the Danish Navy. These four ships are about equal in total missile capacity to the existing surface combatant force of the Royal Navy today."

Brilliant isn't it? However, those obama social programs must be paid for and who better to "CONTRIBUTE" than US Military, especially the Navy? DFO
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 15-03-2012, 18:22
Alex Mandel Alex Mandel is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 63
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Designeraccd, thank you for your information. And, I totally agree with your points... with every word.
In June 2011 I was aboard the USS Anzio and it looked like the ship is in a great shape, and her CO and crew were proud of her. So what happens is just a shame...
Still, it seems to me there's still some hope (if even small one). As we can see these decommissioning dates are scheduled for a period after January 2013 - i.e. after the date of inauguration of the new President, if the current President will not be re-elected.
So if this will happen and if the new leaders will be more attentive to the needs of national defense, they will have some time to stop this nonsense... if they will want, it will not take too much time, there's nothing impossible in it. Remember, the USS Ponce was recently saved virtually in the last moment! As far as I remember Romney strongly criticized the weakening tendencies about the US Navy a couple months ago and promised (if being elected) to reverse this trend, and particularly to increase the new shipbuilding orders up to 15 new ships yearly.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 15-03-2012, 19:32
designeraccd's Avatar
designeraccd designeraccd is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Now that is indeed real HOPE for worthy CHANGE!!: "i.e. after the date of inauguration of the new President, if the current President will not be re-elected."
DFO

Last edited by designeraccd : 15-03-2012 at 21:49.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 19-03-2012, 12:57
Alex Mandel Alex Mandel is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 63
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by designeraccd View Post
Now that is indeed real HOPE for worthy CHANGE!!: "i.e. after the date of inauguration of the new President, if the current President will not be re-elected."
DFO
Sounds like a ray of Hope maybe?

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/0...nding-031912w/
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 19-03-2012, 16:42
The Skipper The Skipper is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by designeraccd View Post
Now that is indeed real HOPE for worthy CHANGE!!: "i.e. after the date of inauguration of the new President, if the current President will not be re-elected."
DFO
So Mitt Romney says that he will reverse the decline of the Navy. Brilliant. Mitt for President!

Also I am confused when I hear that six more Perry class frigates are being sold overseas; I had read that the remaining Perrys were being refitted to remain in service indefinitely, and that the refits would include installing a 25-mm gun on the foredeck where the Standard missile launcher used to be. Can anyone clarify what is going on here.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 27-03-2012, 01:52
CGRET's Avatar
CGRET CGRET is offline
Vice-Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sweet Home, Oregon
Posts: 1,788
Post Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

The current budget cuts in the US Armed Forces are sadly the end result of the last sitting president, NOT the current. We spend more time playing the blame game with the current president. And yet no one is willing to do the research to verify or even understand how US ended up in this economic crisis. It appears to me that the current president is an easy target.

Also lets look at the historical facts behind running up the deficit in the US, who among our US colleague can answer this question:

Which President run the national deficit up to almost 100%?

And it's not the current President.

Regards
Charles
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 27-03-2012, 02:12
Surfgun Surfgun is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 618
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

True, if one plays the game of percentages. The current President did in three years what the last one took eight (in deficit dollars spent and this one is just getting warmed up).
We went from the frying pan, and straight into the fire.

Last edited by Surfgun : 27-03-2012 at 02:27.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 27-03-2012, 10:32
designeraccd's Avatar
designeraccd designeraccd is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

An astute, accurate and succinct observation: "The current President did in three years what the last one took eight (in deficit dollars spent and this one is just getting warmed up).
We went from the frying pan, and straight into the fire."

Meanwhile the USN (and the other Services) suffer to help pay the bill for dear leader's socialist agenda. However, from what I've gleaned, despite pouring major money into "repairing" the PORT ROYAL after her Pearl Harbor grounding, the ship is basically a floating junk pile not worth "saving". DFO
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 28-03-2012, 00:46
CGRET's Avatar
CGRET CGRET is offline
Vice-Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sweet Home, Oregon
Posts: 1,788
Post Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Yes, it is fair opinion on the current president.

Now let's look back in time which President had the Iowa Class brought back into service?

Once you answer the above question then you will see who holds the record for Deficit spending. This is documented as far which President had the most deficit spending during there term/s in office.

Moreover this is off topic, SORRY!

Regards
Charles
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 30-03-2012, 12:33
Brian Wentzell's Avatar
Brian Wentzell Brian Wentzell is offline
Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 2,051
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

The US Navy Shipbuilding Report of 28 March 2012 indicates that the 7 Ticonderoga Class Cruisers will be placed "Out of Commission In Reserve" and not dismantled as previously reported. It will be interesting to see how long they remain in that state in view of the ever increasing obsolescence that occurs in our high technology world. At least ships with considerable hull life remaining are not prematurely discarded.

The two Whidbey Island Class LSD's and USS Peleliu (LHA 5) will be placed in reserve as well. This action would seem reasonable to preserve a mobilization base for the Marines.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 31-03-2012, 10:14
BlackBat242's Avatar
BlackBat242 BlackBat242 is offline
Rear-Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,355
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

More likely spare parts reserve, unless war with Iran (or China) comes soon.
__________________
Only a fool fights in a burning house. __ Jon A., Sgt USMC '81-'89; CV-61 USS Ranger '85-'87
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-04-2012, 15:44
The Skipper The Skipper is offline
Chief Petty Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surfgun View Post
True, if one plays the game of percentages. The current President did in three years what the last one took eight (in deficit dollars spent and this one is just getting warmed up).
We went from the frying pan, and straight into the fire.
As my knowledge of budgetary matters is far less than my knowledge of naval matters, could anyone please tell me the last time that Congress actually passed a balanced budget?

It seems to me, that the more the government borrows, the greater the percentage of tax revenue spent on debt repayment; therefore, if the government continues to borrow more money every year, eventually 100% of its annual revenue will be spent on debt repayment and there will be nothing left to fund essential services. Britain is experiencing such a situation at present; she hs no navy left of which to speak, and is also making major cuts to fire and police departments. Allegedly, 67% of all taxes raised in Britain are spent on debt repayment, and I have also heard that the British government repays to the banks, every day of the year, enough money to build an aircraft carrier.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-04-2012, 16:17
CGRET's Avatar
CGRET CGRET is offline
Vice-Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sweet Home, Oregon
Posts: 1,788
Post Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Just in case no one got the answer to my question the President in question was Ronald Reagan, his deficit spending was 110%.


Just some information most are unaware.

Regards
Charles
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-04-2012, 00:30
WGVSr WGVSr is offline
Vice Commodore
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 726
Default Re: 7 US Navy Cruisers to be Decommissioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Skipper View Post
As my knowledge of budgetary matters is far less than my knowledge of naval matters, could anyone please tell me the last time that Congress actually passed a balanced budget?

It seems to me, that the more the government borrows, the greater the percentage of tax revenue spent on debt repayment; therefore, if the government continues to borrow more money every year, eventually 100% of its annual revenue will be spent on debt repayment and there will be nothing left to fund essential services. Britain is experiencing such a situation at present; she hs no navy left of which to speak, and is also making major cuts to fire and police departments. Allegedly, 67% of all taxes raised in Britain are spent on debt repayment, and I have also heard that the British government repays to the banks, every day of the year, enough money to build an aircraft carrier.
Seems like one of Clinton's was 'called' a balanced budget, although I had my doubts at the time. I think the last official balanced budgets were in the Eisenhower years [56 and/or 57 ?].
Bill
Reply With Quote
Reply



Ship Search by Name : Advanced Search
Random Timeline Entry : 27th January 1943 : HMS Hare : Laid down at Harland & Wolff Ltd. (Belfast, Northern Ireland)

NAVAL PRINTS

Click above to see our naval art portal - Eight random half price items are displayed to the right.

Some Current Half Price Offers

 The Dido class cruiser HMS Naiad is pictured together with the cruiser HMS Leander during the encounter with the French Guepard in 1941 whilst they were both engaged in operations against the Vichy-French forces in Syria.

HMS Naiad by Ivan Berryman.
Half Price! - £15.00
 U-35 under the command of Kapitänleutnant Lothar von Arnauld de la Perière, the all time most successful u-boat captain sinking 194 ships, many of which were sunk by the u-boats 88mm deck gun.

Kapitänleutnant Lothar von Arnauld de la Perière, U-35 by Ivan Berryman. (P)
Half Price! - £550.00
 Designed by the great Ernst Heinkel, the diminutive D.1 was an essential stop-gap that provided the Austro-Hungarian pilots with a front line fighter until they were able to re-equip with Albatros scouts in the Summer of 1917. This little aircraft performed well and was generally held in high regard by its pilots, although it did have some shortcomings, namely that forward vision was extremely limited and the Schwarzloses gun was completely concealed in the overwing pod that made it inaccessible in the air. Most unusual of all was its interplane strut arrangement, designed to reduce drag, which gave it the nicknames Starstrutter or Spider. These examples are shown passing above the German cruiser Derfflinger. 

Brandenburg D.1 by Ivan Berryman. (AP)
Half Price! - £140.00
 Showing visible signs of her tangle with British cruisers at the Battle of the River Plate, the German pocket battleship Graf Spee slips into the neutral waters of the Montevideo roadstead for light repairs.  This was to be the last haven for the Graf Spee which was later scuttled at the harbour mouth, her commander Kapitan zur See Langsdorff believing a large British fleet to be waiting for attempted escape into the South Atlantic.

Admiral Graf Spee by Ivan Berryman (AP)
Half Price! - £25.00

 A splendid little war was how John Hay, ambassador to Britain, described the Spanish-American war of 1898. Though the war was small in scope it was large in consequences; it promoted the regeneration of the American Navy and the emergence of the United States as a major world power. Fought primarily at sea, the war created an American naval legend in its opening encounter between the pacific squadrons of Spain and the United States at Manila Bay on the 1st of May 1898. At sunrise Admiral Dewey, leading the American fleet in his flagship the USS Olympia, had caught the Spanish fleet, under Admiral Patricio Montojo, by surprise - still anchored off Sangley Point at Manila Bay in the Philippine Islands. Defeat for the Spanish was total and heralded the end of a once extensive Spanish empire in the Americas. Montojos flagship, Reina Cristina, is seen here under fire from the Olympia.

The Battle of Manila Bay by Anthony Saunders (Y)
Half Price! - £82.50
Westland Wyverns go vertical over HMS Eagle during the Suez Crisis of 1956

Up and Over by Randall Wilson.
Half Price! - £35.00
With her mizzen top already gone and her sails aloft having received severe punishment, Victory breaks through the line behind the French flagship Bucentaure, delivering a shattering broadside into her stern.  So severe was this opening fire that the Bucentaure was effectively put out of the rest of the battle, although Admiral Villeneuve himself was to miraculously survive the carnage.  Beyong Victory can be seen the French Redoubtable, which is receiving fire from Victorys starboard guns, and the Spanish San Leandro is in the extreme distance.  Most of Victorys stunsails have been cut away, but it was her stunsail booms that became entangled with the rigging of the Redoubtable when she put her helm to port and ran onto her.  Admiral Nelson fell shortly afterward, having received a fatal wound from a musket ball fired by a French sharpshooter in Redoubtables mizzen fighting top.  The Temeraire can be seen approaching the fray to the right.

Trafalgar - The Destruction of the Bucentaure by Ivan Berryman.
Half Price! - £15.00
 Between 24th may and 4th June 1940 an extraordinary armada of craft, large and small, naval and civilian, embarked on one of the greatest rescue missions in history. the evacuation of 330,000 British and French troops from the beaches of Dunkirk in northern France. the destroyer HMS Wakeful dominates the foreground here as troops pour onto the beaches and harbour moles in search of salvation. Both Wakeful and distant HMS Grafton were lost during the evacuation.

Dunkirk by Ivan Berryman (AP)
Half Price! - £25.00

SPORT PRINTS

Click above to see our sport art portal - Four random half price items are displayed to the right.

Some Current Half Price Offers

 Rothmans Williams Renault FW18.  World Champion 1996.
Damon Hill by Michael Thompson.
Half Price! - £25.00
FAR695.  Tribute to Lester Piggott by Stuart McIntyre.

Tribute to Lester Piggott by Stuart McIntyre.
Half Price! - £20.00
 Michael Schumacher celebrates another win for Ferrari.
Dream Team by Franklin.
Half Price! - £25.00
This montage shows Trigger winning the Goodwood Cup in 1995, 1997 and 1998.

Double Trigger by Stephen Smith.
Half Price! - £50.00

AVIATION PRINTS

Click above to see our aviation art portal - Four random half price items are displayed to the right.

Some Current Half Price Offers

 A Royal Air Force Wessex HC2 Helicopter picks up troops somewhere in Northern Ireland.

Pup Northern Ireland by John Wynne Hopkins. (Y)
Half Price! - £50.00
Mosquitos of 105 Squadron, Marham.  No. 105 Squadron, stationed at Marham, Norfolk, became the first Royal Air Force unit to become operational flying the Mosquito B. Mk. IV bomber on 11th April 1942.  The painting shows 105 Squadron on the raid of 10th April 1945, to the Wahren railway marshalling yards at Leipzig, Germany.

Return From Leipzig by Anthony Saunders. (C)
Half Price! - £40.00
 The Sopwith Dolphin was a radical departure from previous Sopwith design philosophies, embodying a reverse-stagger on the wings, a water-cooled Hispano-Suiza engine and an unusual, but highly popular positioning of the cockpit which gave the pilot unprecedented views. One exponent of this purposeful looking machine was Canadian Major A D Carter who claimed many of his 31 victories flying the Dolphin. He is shown here sending an Albatross to the ground on 8th May 1918 whilst flying C4017. Carter was himself shot down soon after became a prisoner of war. He was killed in 1919 whilst test flying a Fokker D.VII at Shoreham, Sussex.

Major Albert Carter by Ivan Berryman. (GS)
Half Price! - £290.00
 Shown in the colours of Jasta Boelke and carrying Baumers personal red / white / black flash on the fuselage, Fokker DR.1 204/17 was the aircraft in which he scored many of his 43 victories. Although the Sopwith Triplane had been withdrawn from service, German pilots frequently found their DR.1s being mistakenly attacked by their own flak batteries and, sometimes, by other pilots. For this reason, in march 1918, Baumers aircraft bore additional crosses on the centre of the tailplane and on the lower wings to aid identification. For some reason, his rudder displayed what appeared to be an incomplete border to the national marking. Nicknamed Der Eiserne Adler – The Iron Eagle – Paul Baumer survived the war, but died in a flying accident near Copenhagen whilst testing the Rohrbach Rofix fighter. He is shown in action having just downed an RE.8 while, above him, Leutnant Otto Lofflers DR.1 190/17 banks into the sun to begin another attack.

Leutnant Paul Baumer by Ivan Berryman. (Y)
Half Price! - £40.00

MILITARY PRINTS

Click above to see our military art portal - Four random half price items are displayed to the right.

Some Current Half Price Offers

 Superb figure study of the 82nd Airborne in 1944.

82nd Airborne by Chris Collingwood. (Y)
Half Price! - £50.00
 Jagdpanthers of 654 heavy Tank Battalion engage 6th Guards Tank Brigade Churchills.
Debut at Caumont, Normandy, 30th July 1944 by David Pentland. (D)
Half Price! - £70.00
 Wherever the GIs went they took their Jeeps with them, and before the war was run the little quarter-ton, 4-wheel drive, utility vehicle was as well known around the world as the Model T Ford. Nicolas Trudgian has painted a compelling image, set back in time when the little Jeep was omnipresent on and around the roads and battlefields of a war-torn world. It is Christmas 1944 and, as a gaggle of 339th FG P-51 Mustangs disturb the peace of this ancient English village, a little Jeep waits patiently outside the pub while her occupants sample the local ale. A wonderfully nostalgic painting that will bring back pleasant memories to many.
Welcome Respite by Nicolas Trudgian.
Half Price! - £70.00
 King Tigers of Kampfgruppe von Rosen, 3rd Company Heavy Tank Battalion 503, preparing to move out from the Tisza bridgehead to counter Soviet pressure on German forces attacking to the northwest at Debrecen during the first battles to defend the Hungarian capital of Budapest.

Tigers in the Mist by David Pentland.
Half Price! - £95.00
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ships Musters and Ships Record and Establishment Books. Sailmakers Mate Service Records / Naval Relatives and Friends 11 21-08-2011 18:58
RN Ships 3 - Recent Ships astraltrader Photo Galleries 30 17-06-2011 07:08


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.