PDA

View Full Version : HMS Antelope: Falklands Loss 1982


The Sailor
18-01-2008, 04:04
HMS Antelope (F170) was a Type 21 frigate of the Royal Navy that participated in the Falklands War. Her keel was laid down March 23, 1971 by Vosper Thornycroft in Woolston, Southampton, England. She was commissioned July 17, 1975.

Falklands War duty

On May 23, 1982, while Antelope was on air defence duty at the entrance to San Carlos Water, protecting a beachhead established two days earlier, she came under attack by Argentine A-4 Skyhawk jets.
Two 1100-pound bombs struck the ship on the Starboard side, killing one crewman, Steward Mark R. Stephens.
After initial damage control efforts, Antelope proceeded to more sheltered waters so that two EOD technicians from the Royal Corps of Engineers could come aboard and attempt to defuse the bombs. On the fourth attempt to defuse one of the bombs, a time-delay device detonated the weapon, killing Staff Sergeant James Prescott and severely injuring Warrant Officer Phillips, the other member of the EOD team. The ship was torn open from water line to funnel, with the blast starting major fires in both engine rooms which spread very quickly. The starboard fire main was fractured, the ship lost all electrical power, and the commanding officer, Commander Nick Tobin, gave the order to abandon ship. Tobin was the last person to leave the ship, and about five minutes after his departure, the missile magazines began exploding.

Explosions continued throughout the night, and the following day Antelope was found to be still afloat, but her keel had broken and her superstructure melted into a heap of twisted metal. Antelope broke in half and sank that day.
TV and stills pictures of Antelope's demise became one of the defining images of the Falklands War and appear repeatedly in histories of the event.
The casualties could have been much higher. The ship's company were very lucky to escape.

The famous photo below of the magazine blowing.

herakles
18-01-2008, 05:15
Someone should do a thread on the various naval engagements at The Falklands.

It's seen more than its fair share of action over a long period of time.

The Sailor
18-01-2008, 05:58
A lot of actions have been fought in that area Herk.
In my posts, I have been covering:
the Battle of Coromel in 1914
the battle of the Falklands in 1914
the Battle of the River Plate in 1939
and the second Battle of the Falklands 1982

herakles
18-01-2008, 07:35
And covering them very well Sailor.

I was thinking more of the 19th century.

Melv.
24-01-2008, 10:34
Someone should do a thread on the various naval engagements at The Falklands.

It's seen more than its fair share of action over a long period of time.


I was in the Falklands (1982/3) and made a point of visiting the military cemetary at Port Stanley. It was interesting to see the graves of friend and foe alike.
You can see why Port Stanley is such an important and strategic military base, even by today standards.
The equivilent of operating 3 Navy carriers I reckon especially now with the fully operational and (almost) combat ready airfield at the Government's disposal should it be required again.
We (I) were operating out of Port Stanley airfield which was far from adequate and very limiting on operations.

herakles
24-01-2008, 10:53
I can't imagine the Argentinians being interested n the Falklands again.

The Sailor
24-01-2008, 11:17
They haven't lost interest Herk. I'd say that they are waiting for a time when there are no more Maggie Thatchers and they judge that Britain either can't or won't react like they did in 1982.

herakles
24-01-2008, 12:29
Yes Sailor, but those were the conditions the last time. Now the Colonels have been removed and the country much quieter.

I accept that they still regard the Falklands as theirs.

Lancastrian
03-03-2009, 13:11
HMS Antelope. 23 May 1982. Returning to San Carlos Water.
http://www.worldnavalships.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=36994&d=1236089014