PDA

View Full Version : The Archangel Expedition


herakles
10-01-2008, 02:01
The recent thread on the Arctic convoys to Russia in WW2 reminded me of an earlier situation - the so-called Archangel Expedition of 1918.

This expedition has parallels to the Gallipoli campaign of 1915 in that:
it was a good idea in theory and a failure in practice
its intention was to open a second front
it involved the British navy and British and Commonwealth land forces
it was the child of Churchill and is sometimes called "Churchill's War"
its commander was given almost no warning of his role and no time to prepare for it.

The collapse of the Russian government and the overthrow of the Czar was a matter of great interest to the Allies. The Czar's departure was the key to Woodrow Wilson's decision to commit American forces to the Great War. Until that happened, he wasn't prepared to.

With the fall of the government, Russian commitment to the war ceased, allowing the Germans to close the Eastern Front and concentrate all their forces on the Western Front. Realise that Lenin was given safe passage to Russia by the Germans precisely to cause this to happen. As soon as he came to power, an armistice with Germany was signed, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918.

The rise of the Bolsheviks was seen as an intense threat that needed nullifying.

The key to doing this was the city of Archangel. The English and French governments decided to send an expedition there: to prevent extensive stockpiles of armaments falling into German/Bolshevik hands; to rescue the Czech Legion which at the time was stranded along the Trans-Siberian railway; and to defeat the Bolsheviks. ("Strangle them at birth" was the way Churchill described it.)

Being desperately short of troops, the Americans were invited to participate. Which they did in a minor way, mostly in a guard keeping role. They arrived in September 1918.

Lieut.-Colonel Edmund Ironside was placed in charge of the expedition and soon after arriving, found himself CinC as the actual CinC, Gen. Poole took a month's leave and never returned. His brief was: 'Your business in North Russia is to hold the fort until the local Russians can take the field. You are to prepare for a winter campaign.'

Ironside later wrote:

"The coming winter campaign might have daunted anyone. We were proposing to occupy a great area with very few troops, none of whom had any experience of Arctic weather, with the sole exception of the Canadians. There were no troops trained to run on skis or snow shoes, and it was now too late to train them. The whole country was one vast forest, a swamp in early and late summer, deep in snow in winter.
There were no roads, so that mechanical transport could not be used, but countless tracks led in every direction, and no existing maps showed where they ran."

Murmansk was captured in July 1918. Using this as a base, a combined naval and air force captured Modiuga Island thus allowing the capture of Archangel in August 1918. Safely in their hands, several thousand White Russians immediately volunteered to join this army.

The Royal Navy successfully contained the Bolshevik fleet in St. Petersburg, at the time called Petrograd. Several raids by the RAF and Coastal Motor Torpedo Boats into the harbour, inflicted much damage.

The army stayed in Archangel a year, managing to keep control of it. But the Bolsheviks were able to concentrate their forces there after the German Armistace and Archangel became totally isolated.

Further, popular opinion in England was rising dramatically against the expedition and there were instances of a few British soldiers refusing to fight and being court-martailed. And the Russians mutinied and were deserting in droves. The Americans withdrew in May 1919.

Finally, a withdrawal from Archangel was planned and executed in August/September 1919. It was felt that there was no alternative. The British naval base was closed in September. The blockade ended in January 1920. A total of 13,000 British and 2,000 French troops had to be withdrawn. The withdrawal from Murmansk took place in October. And they never did rescue the Czech Legion, which fought its way out in February 1920. Archangel fell to the Red Army in February 1920, the remaining White Russians having been led at the time by the British Gen. Miller.

On his return to England, Ironside was demoted and put on half pay until the government read the despatches. He was then promoted to Major General on full pay. In 1939 he was to go to France as a field-marshal and Chief of the Imperial General Staff.

In all, 5 VC's were awarded, three to the Royal Navy and two to Australian soldiers. There is no campaign medal and no official history. Britain and France recognised the USSR in 1924.

The Sailor
10-01-2008, 02:35
Great post and informative reading Herk.
I never knew this.
The two Australian soldiers who won the VC there were S. Pearse and A. Sullivan.
Here is the details in this site.

Sergeant Pearse
On 24 August 1919, north of Emtsa, North Russia, Sergeant Pearse cut his way through enemy barbed wire under very heavy machine-gun and rifle fire and cleared a way for the troops to enter an enemy battery position. He then charged a blockhouse which was harassing the advance and causing casualties, and killed the occupants with bombs. A minute later he was killed, but it was due to him that the position was carried with so few casualties. Other Decorations; MM
Later achieved rank of Second Lieutenant.


Corporal Sullivan
On 10 August 1919, at Sheika River, North Russia, the platoon to which Corporal Sullivan belonged, after fighting a rearguard covering action, had to cross the river by means of a narrow plank, and during the passage an officer and three men fell into a deep swamp. Without hesitation, Corporal Sullivan, under intense fire, jumped into the river and rescued all four, bringing them out singly. But for this gallant action, the men would undoubtedly have drowned, as all ranks were exhausted and the enemy was less than 100 yards away.


http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-conflicts-periods/other/russia.htm

herakles
10-01-2008, 02:46
I didn't want to give too much information in this thread. Your link has provided a great deal more than just being on the two Australians.

Thanks for that.

tim lewin
10-01-2008, 05:09
If this period is interesting you might also like to read about the adventures of the RNAS in the Caspian, mainly based around Baku in Azerbaijan. I know there are some flyers in the forum. This was every bit as fascinating a story of RN history in the post-First War period when Russia's fate swung from interest group to interest group weekly. There is a British war memorial in Baku from this era which is well maintained. I cant remember right now where i found the histroy of these exploits in primitive RN planes but if anyone is interested will dig it out.#
tim

Ironic that the port of Murmansk was built by British engineers for their own supply train to defeat the Soviets and then became the centre of the supply train to support them! The importance of Murmansk is that it doesnt freeze, Arkangels, as does the whole White Sea in the colder winter months.
tim

herakles
10-01-2008, 06:01
When researching this thread, I did read about Baku and also about the fighting on the east coast of Russia. Both are most interesting.

But I felt to incorporate everything would have made an unworkable thread.

Having myself experience of Russian winters, I can only sympathise with the troops on the ground and at sea. That they were also unprepared and ill equipped only makes it worse. And now I come to think of it, flying must have been a nightmare.

It's a pity that many excellent ideas were created in Whitehall but that their execution left a lot to be desired.

Looking back on the period of WW1, I can only imagine how different things might have turned out.

DocDave
09-04-2012, 21:30
My maternal grandfather Thomas Henry Chaplin (b1900) is supposed to have been involved in the Archangel campaign whilst serving in the merchant navy. I have a number of great postcards he brought back showing local scenes and people. One of them, which shows the Solovetsky convent on an island in the White Sea has a message on the back to his family, "on active service" written at the top and a stamp "X19" - presumably some kind of official mark that the card had passed military censorship and was safe to go?

Recently I discovered that he was on the "Orita" in November 1918 (formerly a passenger ship sailing from the UK to South America, but being used to transport troops during WWI). So maybe it was on this ship that he went to Archangel, perhaps being involved in taking British troops there? Hope to find out more sometime.

Certainly a fascinating campaign; a classic case of politicians wishes far outstripping the military means they could deploy. :)

The attached image is supposedly Tom Chaplin and a couple of mates during the campaign.

BlackBat242
09-04-2012, 22:16
Note that there was another, eastern, counterpart... the occupation of Vladivostok by US, Japanese, Italian, French, and British troops*.

This was to secure the eastern end of the Trans-Siberian railway, to allow for the escape of the ~70,000 Czechs & Slovaks of the Czech Legion (and many former POWs and Austro-Hungarian deserters).

The Arkhangelsk front was originally intended as a diversion, to tie up "Red Russian" forces and so the "White Russian" forces in the south of Russia could re-group and counter-attack the "Reds").

The Northern force (~6,500 British & 5,700 US) was then ordered to seize 2 railroads at Kotlas and Vologda... 400 miles south of Arkhangelsk and only 350 miles north of Moscow.

They never reached their objectives before having to retreat.



* US: 8,000
Japan: 70,000 (were supposed to have no more than 12,000)
Italy: 1,400
Britain: 829, France: 107

The US troops ended up primarily acting to prevent Japanese seizure of Russian territory, since the Russian Far East was under "White" control.

See The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power chapter 9 Blood on the Snow by Max Boot (2002)

DocDave
10-04-2012, 19:12
One of the great historical "what if's" to my mind - What would have happened had the western allies been prepared to commit the level of troops that Japan put in to the far east and really got stuck in? But then you also have to take account of the numerous diverse anti Bolshevik forces, their widely differing political agendas, often rampant corruption, military weakness and the fact that the Reds held the central position. Maybe one side was always going to win?

Anyway, here is one of my postcards, showing shipping in the harbour at Archangel. Who knows, maybe my grandad's ship is in there somewhere? :confused: