PDA

View Full Version : SUEZ MARU


herakles
18-09-2008, 20:50
SUEZ MARU (November 29, 1943)

On the islands of Ambon and Hasuku in the Moluccas, Allied prisoners were dying daily through starvation, disease and beatings by their guards. In the past six months almost 400 had died and around 700 were too sick to work. The Japanese then decided to send the sick back to Java. A total of 640 men, including a number of Japanese sick patients, were taken on board the 4,645-ton passenger-cargo ship Suez Maru. In two holds, 422 sick British (including 221 RAF servicemen) and 127 sick Dutch prisoners, including up to twenty stretcher cases, were accommodated. The Japanese patients filled the other two holds.

Escorted by a minesweeper W-12, the Suez Maru set sail from Port Amboina but while entering the Java Sea and about 327 kilometres east of Surabaya, Java, Netherlands East Indies, the vessel was torpedoed by the American submarine USS Bonefish commanded by Cdr. Tom Hogan. The ship started to list as water poured into the holds drowning hundreds. Hundreds more, Allied and Japanese, managed to escape the holds and were struggling in the water. The Japanese mine sweeper W-12 started to pick up survivors, but only their own nationals, leaving the British captives behind. Between 200 and 250 men were floating in the sea.

The minesweeper then made several slow circles around the survivors and minutes later machine-gun and rifle fire were directed towards the defenceless swimmers. Empty rafts and lifeboats were then rammed and sunk by the W-12. The minesweeper then picked up speed and sped off towards Batavia (Jakarta). They had rescued 93 Japanese soldiers and crewmen and 205 Japanese sick patients. Sixty-nine Japanese had died during the attack.

Back at the site of the sinking only floating wreckage and an oil spill was all that was left of the Suez Maru. Of the 547 British and Dutch prisoners, there was only one survivor, a British soldier, Kenneth Thomas, who was picked up twenty-four hours later by the Australian minesweeper HMAS Ballarat. Over 90 percent of POW deaths at sea was the result of 'friendly fire'.

The USS Bonefish was sunk off Honshu on June 18, 1945, when on her 8th war patrol. All 86 crew were lost. The Bonefish was the last submarine to be sunk in World War 11.

The story of the fighting on Ambon and its fall is well known to many Aussie veterans and is recalled with great sadness.

The Japanese Government was signatory to the "Third Geneva Convention of 1929"- with respect to the treatment of POWs- but in the end failed ratify it.

BBC Radio 4 recently did this story and you can listen to it here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00dhlf9

There are many links to this ghastly story at Google. I can't a photo of the Suez Maru. Perhaps a member has one.

John Odom
18-09-2008, 22:59
Yes, another ghaastly tale, like so many others. We need to remember thost who made great sacrifice for our freedom. While we need to each work and pray for peace, we must be bopth ready and willing to fight if required.

astraltrader
19-09-2008, 00:55
Pictures of this ship are hard to find Richard, so I am afraid this is the best I can do.
Always glad to help.;)

herakles
19-09-2008, 00:58
Thanks for the addition of the picture.

David Verghese
05-02-2010, 16:17
Some more information about the 'Hell ship' Suez Maru.

Suez Maru:

New construction for the Japanese Mitsui Line but taken over by the Army.

Single hull construction, so that one torpedo would be enough to sink her.

Built: 1919 by Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. Uraga Shipyard, Japan.
Owners: Kuribayasi Syosen K.K.
Class: 1A cargo type.
6,400 tons GRT (Gross registered tonnage). 9,200 tons DWT.
Machinery: VTE Steam.
Fuel: Coal
Length: 445' Speed -58' Beam - 32' Draught.
Speed: 15 knots with 13.5 knots at Cruising speed.

No markings on the ship during transportation of POWs as required by the Third Geneva Convention. Japanese weapons transports typically bore Red Cross markings while the ships carrying prisoners of war -including the Suez Maru- were unmarked and therefore targeted by US submarines.

Reference: Dennis Courant of the Burma Star Association and their website (accessed 5 Feb 2010 for this posting)

Two pictures of the ship are attached. The first, which I think shows the ship in harbour, is from a website about the Shouler family history. The second is from a Japanese marine site.
Copyright is acknowledged where necessary.

The last time I heard about the Suez Maru was during 2008. Here is a link to a newspaper article on the plight faced by relatives of the servicemen involved.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/3212660/British-families-of-Second-World-War-PoWs-demand-massacre-apology.html

Others will comment on the decision, referred to in the article, of the Government of the time (1949). As previously mentioned in the thread Japan did not ratify the 3rd Geneva Convention.

David

Trevalgan
05-02-2010, 19:24
I think the ship on the right is a later Suez Maru as it is definitely a 60's design.You can also see a somewhat modern radar dish above the wheelhouse

David Verghese
05-02-2010, 21:00
Hi Trevalgan,

I think you are right about it being a different Suez Maru. Here is the internet source of the picture.

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://homepage3.nifty.com/jpnships/images/osk_suezmaru.jpg&imgrefurl=http://homepage3.nifty.com/jpnships/company/OSK_sengo_list1.htm&usg=__iUVRhK7aSPfKuUmG-Kt-XDjGgLg=&h=164&w=300&sz=10&hl=en&start=16&sig2=5sWH-hpnY1EgDgXJc_5-HQ&itbs=1&tbnid=QfrT7A8AjoASlM:&tbnh=63&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522Suez%2Bmaru%2522%26gbv%3D2%26hl% 3Den%26sa%3DG&ei=tpFsS9nZDIm6jAe-j8iOBg

The Japanese characters do not come through, but the ship seems to have been built about 1953. Given the infamous history of her recent forebear of a mere 10 years, the renaming is somewhat very insensitive.

David

r.morrison
19-03-2010, 11:16
What I've always found shocking is the fact that when certain media talk of Germany in WW2, they always refer to the POW and Concentration Camps, and deplore the people killed in there.

However, when they talk of the Japanese it's "oh the poor Japanese we dropped two atomic bombs on them!"

Thank you H****** C****** in particular for this sort of behaviour !

Dave Hutson
19-03-2010, 12:26
No markings on the ship during transportation of POWs as required by the Third Geneva Convention. Japanese weapons transports typically bore Red Cross markings while the ships carrying prisoners of war -including the Suez Maru- were unmarked and therefore targeted by US submarines. [David's post #54]

There were many instances of FEPOW's being transported to Japan on all manner of unmarked ships. My own father died on one when the USS Pampanito sank it because it was to all intents and purposes a troopship out of Singapore.

Another source of information is from Burma Star Veteran "Roy [Blackie] Blackler's" book "Guests of the Rising Sun".

Dave H

Don Boyer
05-04-2010, 16:51
Clay Blair's submarine history and other sources cover the sinkings of Japanese merchant vessels carrying POWs in detail. Several ships carrying American POWs from the Philippines to Japan were sunk in transit by submarines. There was no way to know these ships carried POWs, of course, thanks to the usual Japanese callousness towards prisoners. Even if there had been "Ultra" information that such and such Maru was carrying prisoners in convoy, the situation at sea and the general identification books available to submarines would have precluded avoiding the ship under any but ideal conditions.

Thanks to the Japanese military, the POWs faced death every time they went to sea on transports. Of course today, not one single Japanese history book that might be used in a school or college even mentions the issue. Mustn't sully the image of the poor Imperial Army and Navy with such tawdry tales, all a fiction of the imperialist western nations. They were just trying to free their Asian brothers from European domination is all, at great sacrifice. The Rape of Nanking was only a prank by some undisciplined Army troops, too. And the death railroads of Burma were WPA projects using volunteers.

steve roberts
05-04-2010, 17:18
Hi Don.Thanks for your additional information.I have just done a bit on the Geneva Convention on the Medical Branch thread.Did you know that the Japanese never delared any vessel s a Hospital ship.Though they mat have painted one or two to be them.Usually escorted by a bevvy of destroys and armed to the teeth.Hospital ships could not carry prisoners of war in general,unless wounded.But the Allies usually declared a ship carrying POW's.
Regards Steve.:mad: